Menu
The procurement process in higher education involves navigating complex negotiations to secure the best contracts with suppliers. From sourcing and vetting vendors to drafting agreements, procurement teams must balance policies, relationships, and budgets to meet institutional needs effectively. This requires strategic planning, research, collaboration, and creative problem-solving to reach mutually beneficial deals.
Navigating the complexities of contract negotiation in the higher education procurement process requires a structured approach and strategic plan.
A procurement contract is an agreement between your educational institution and your suppliers. It is a legally binding agreement that details the agreed-upon goods or services, pricing, terms, and conditions.
The procurement process in education will help identify suppliers, but the procurement contract is where the details live.
Before you can write procurement contracts, you need to source suppliers and discuss terms and pricing. There are several different approaches the procurement teams use, including:
With competitive bidding, procurement teams solicit proposals from multiple vendors for needed goods or services. After drafting detailed specifications, bids are evaluated based on the ability to meet requirements and cost. The lowest qualified bidder typically wins the contract, though the total value is also assessed beyond just pricing.
Competitive bidding encourages competition to get better rates and compare options side-by-side.
Sole sourcing involves procuring from a single supplier rather than multiple vendors. This is applicable when only one company can fully meet the department’s specialized needs and specifications. While sole sourcing does not promote competition, it is appropriate for compatibility, expertise, or customization requirements that limit viable options.
Collaborative purchasing partners with other organizations or institutions to combine purchasing power and resources. By aggregating demand across multiple buyers, collaborative buying achieves lower prices through economies of scale. It also saves time by reducing administrative efforts compared to independent procurement.
Much of the procurement process in education revolves around finding and vetting suppliers. Several key steps can help.
Analyzing current spend patterns can help identify opportunities for improvement.
Break expenditures down by department, category, and supplier to gain visibility into where money is going. This detailed profiling of costs can help you find priority areas that offer the biggest gains.
Consider conducting Strategic Spend Assessments (SSAs) regularly to benchmark current contracts against industry standards to identify gaps. E&I Cooperative Services® members can get ongoing SSAs at no cost to ensure you are always getting best-in-class pricing.
In exploring new suppliers, do not just default to the vendors already in your systems. Actively look for new market entrants who may offer aggressive pricing to earn business. For example, E&I provides access to over 150 competitively sourced contracts with top brands across nearly every category that can save you money or help you negotiate a better procurement contract with your supplier.
When comparing options, look at total value rather than just pursuing the lowest price. Factors like quality, reliability, on-time delivery, service levels, and support is crucial. The cheapest option is only worthwhile if it fully meets your needs — inconsistent or poor service creates additional costs and takes time to rectify.
When requesting bids, provide potential suppliers with detailed requirements around expected volumes, service levels, performance metrics, timelines, and reporting needs. The more precise the specifications, the better vendors can tailor proposals and pricing.
By working collaboratively with suppliers, you may also be able to identify key areas that should be included in your RFPs or RFQs.
Cooperative purchasing can significantly improve your bargaining positions and discounts. Working collaboratively with other educational institutions or cooperatives provides bulk buying power to negotiate better procurement contracts.
E&I leverages the purchasing power of its 6,000 members to secure deep discounts across categories due to its sole education focus and strong vendor relationships. Members can benchmark E&I contracts against their own to find savings opportunities, with no obligation to use the contracts.
What are the different types of procurement contracts? Let’s examine some higher education contract purchase order examples.
There are several different types of documents in purchasing process in higher education, depending on the type of purchase you need to make and the terms and conditions you negotiate. The type of procurement contract you choose will impact responsibilities, flexibility, and risk for buyers and suppliers.
Here are some of the most common higher education contract purchase order examples.
Also called lump-sum contracts, fixed rate agreements lock in pricing upfront for the services or products to be provided. The supplier receives the predetermined amount regardless of any cost increases on their end. These straightforward contracts work well for recurring purchases of items like office supplies. However, they allow little flexibility if needs change.
Fixed-rate contracts include:
Benefits are predictable pricing and supplier responsibility for costs. Drawbacks are less flexibility and higher risk for vendors.
With reimbursement contracts, the buyer repays the seller for approved expenses accrued during a project. This often covers materials, labor, utilities, etc. Suppliers also receive an extra payment on top of a fee.
Types of reimbursement contracts:
These agreements shift risk onto vendors but allow buyers more flexibility if needs evolve. Best for one-time complex purchases like construction.
Time and materials contracts bill the buyer for actual time invested at agreed-upon hourly or daily rates. Material costs are also reimbursed. Caps on time and materials are common to limit cost overruns.
Benefits include flexibility for changing projects like software development. Drawbacks are unpredictable costs and higher risk for buyers.
Procurement in higher education often centers around rigid requests for proposals that align with institutional policies. Requirements like competitive bidding, diversity, and fairness generally cannot be negotiated. However, flexibility in other areas can benefit both buyers and suppliers.
According to McKinsey research, organizations that foster supplier collaboration achieve lower costs and better outcomes versus those that do not. Beyond mandatory policies, a collaborative approach to procurement yields advantages through mutual understanding and problem-solving. Rather than treating the process as strictly transactional, buyers and sellers can work together to optimize value.
This research also identified five key areas that are necessary to build relationships and collaboration:
The path to mutually beneficial agreements starts early by providing suppliers with comprehensive insights. Cataloging the scope and frequency of procurement needs helps vendors identify economies of scale and savings opportunities.
Transparency is also key – clearly outline the process, parameters, and decision factors. Being receptive to supplier feedback on RFPs results in stronger procurement contracts.
Successfully negotiating procurement contracts starts with defining what success looks like before sitting down at the table. You need to know what you want out of a negotiation, but also how you can benefit your supplier.
A few questions to ask yourself include:
The National Association of Educational Professionals (NAEP) studied a large number of contracts across hundreds of schools, colleges, and universities. They found that about 91% of all spending in education goes to the top 20% of an institution’s suppliers. The remaining 9% were split among up to 1,000 different vendors with most amounts less than $1,000.
While having the choice among a long list of suppliers provides options, every solicitation and contract negotiation takes time. In many cases, consolidating fewer suppliers can reduce the workload and produce higher savings due to increased volume.
Going into any negotiation, you want to do your research. Take a data-driven approach analyzing historic spending and suppliers in the category, forecasted volumes, prevailing pricing benchmarks, similar existing contract terms, and past performance data. These spend analytics insights allow you to negotiate from a position of strength.
Look beyond the supplier’s obvious financial motivations to understand their wider business goals and challenges. If you can help them achieve their goals, you can likely negotiate better terms. For instance, consider what non-monetary incentives you could offer, such as consistent volume.
There are many ways your procurement team can inadvertently derail negotiations despite good preparation. For example, if things are not going well during negotiations, it can be frustrating and lead to impasses. Tensions can rise. It helps to acknowledge the tension and take time out if needed to think through situations calmly and clearly.
When negotiating, avoid rushing to assumptions or hardened stances. Listen closely to understand the other side’s perspective to seek common ground. Creativity and compromise require open-mindedness since multiple effective solutions likely exist.
After signing a contract, debrief with your team on what worked well to repeat next time and what can be improved. Each experience builds skills to enhance future negotiations.
E&I Cooperatives Services is the only non-profit, member-owned cooperative that works exclusively with schools, colleges, and universities. This sole focus on education translates to deep experience and understanding of the unique needs of the education procurement process.
Membership in E&I is free and there is no obligation to use the contracts. However, bulk buying power typically creates significant cost savings for members who opt in. Many suppliers provide special incentives or rebates to E&I members.
Because E&I is a cooperative, members may also benefit from patronage rebates based on volume at the end of the year.
Contact the experts at E&I Cooperative Services today to explore more diverse source, and competitively sourced procurement contracts, and streamline your procurement process.
